Changes are happening - please bear with us while we update our site.

Changes are happening - please bear with us while we update our site. Click here to give us your advice and feedback.

The bear case for the Redbubble (ASX:RBL) share price

The Redbubble (ASX: RBL) share price has dropped 77%, however, question marks remain over the quality of the products and the business model. Here's my bear thesis.

You’re going to hear from Redbubble (ASX: RBL) bulls that the recent share price pullback has created an investment opportunity of a lifetime, and the operating leverage as they scale will drive up margins.  Well, today I’m going to debate with Lachlan’s bull thesis as to why I think that’s a furphy. 

If you liked Redbubble at $6.70, you’re going to love it at $1.61

Being an investor in Redbubble over the past 15 months has been a difficult ride for the faithful as the share price has dropped ~77%.  I can only presume that the investor day presentation was akin to being invited to the Game of Thrones’ Red Wedding.

Arya after the infamous Red Wedding in Game of Thrones.

However, another way to say “$1.61 per share” is “a market capitalisation of $464 million”.  Regardless of what valuation, the exuberant Mr Market put on Redbubble in January 2021, the current valuation is what we need to consider.

Flush with cash, question mark?

It’s often noted that Redbubble is flush with cash, having $143 million on the balance sheet.  Redbubble receives the cash payment from you and me, makes the t-shirt, sends it off, and then takes 90 days to pay its suppliers.  So most of that cash – $91 million – is owed to its suppliers.  To be fair, its net cash balance is ~$50m.  And its net asset value, if you remove their intangibles (i.e. goodwill from their acquisitions) is around $60 million.

So, I reckon its fair enterprise value is ~$400 million.  This compares with $8 million of EBITDA in 1H22, or ~$15 million average net income per annum over the past three years smoothing for Covid tailwinds.

Source: Redbubble Annual Report 2021.

Operating leverage at the cost of quality

The main bull argument for Redbubble perpetrated by management is operating leverage: as it scales its revenues, the underlying costs will increase at a slower rate, and margins will expand.

Source: Redbubble 1H22 Investor Presentation.

Redbubble has been lowering its operating expenses over time to improve gross margins.  One way of doing that has been shifting from screen printing t-shirts to on-demand (a.k.a. direct-to-garment) printing. Since 2017, forums have been awash with complaints of the quality of t-shirts: designs flaking off, inconsistent size and weight, and even smelling like “rotten fish” on arrival.  I 100% agree.  The shirts I bought pre-2017 remain in my high rotation, while those bought during Covid are already facing the chop.

These gains seem to be unsustainable, and while t-shirts are only 41% of its sales, it’s the business model of lowering quality that represents red flags.

2017 Donald Trump vs Kim Jung Un Street Fighter II T-shirt (maintained quality)

2020 End of the World Toilet Paper Runout T-shirt (flaking design, printed off centre)

2021 Mr Chop Chop a.k.a. Mark ‘Chopper’ Read T-Shirt (fading since first wash)

The platform for artists

While the artists’ revenue is lauded as a ‘step change’, the reality is the percentage of revenue going to artists will increase from 15.96% to 16.66%. Meanwhile, there are concerns flagged around the intellectual property rights infringements by artists selling products on the Redbubble platforms.

Redbubble has argued in court they are not responsible for the art, just the marketplace.  While in some cases, Redbubble has won, some they have lost, and the Hells Angels are now joining in the legal affray. This is a continual challenge to the fundamentals of its business model.

One way for Redbubble to placate artists’ demand for a larger share of the pie is to cut them out.  Redbubble is developing new AI technology to scour the internet for unlicensed photos to print on t-shirts that respond to individual searches. So recently, when I was looking to buy a t-shirt of my favourite Tony Abbott moment, Redbubble was the #1 result on the search engine with a terrible AI-created design using a low-resolution Google photo.  Maybe this will improve over time, or maybe this is another question mark on the business model.

Redbubble t-shirt design of Tony Abbott eating an onion, 28 March 2022.

Final thoughts

Even at today’s prices, there’s a lot of optimism baked into the share price.  Redbubble may grow revenues as it branches out across new verticals, but the overall concerns I have with the quality of the product and the business model still makes this a risky investment in my mind.

$50,000 per year in passive income from shares? Yes, please!

With interest rates UP, now could be one of the best times to start earning passive income from a portfolio. Imagine earning 4%, 5% — or more — in dividend passive income from the best shares, LICs, or ETFs… it’s like magic.

So how do the best investors do it?

Chief Investment Officer Owen Rask has just released his brand new passive income report. Owen has outlined 10 of his favourite ETFs and shares to watch, his rules for passive income investing, why he would buy ETFs before LICs and more.

You can INSTANTLY access Owen’s report for FREE by CLICKING HERE NOW and creating a 100% FREE Rask Account.

(Psst. By creating a free Rask account, you’ll also get access to 15+ online courses, 1,000+ podcasts, invites to events, a weekly value investing newsletter and more!)

Unsubscribe anytime. Read our TermsFinancial Services GuidePrivacy Policy. We’ll never sell your email address. Our company is Australian owned.

Information warning: The information on this website is published by The Rask Group Pty Ltd (ABN: 36 622 810 995) is limited to factual information or (at most) general financial advice only. That means, the information and advice does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not specific to you, your needs, goals or objectives. Because of that, you should consider if the advice is appropriate to you and your needs, before acting on the information. If you don’t know what your needs are, you should consult a trusted and licensed financial adviser who can provide you with personal financial product advice. In addition, you should obtain and read the product disclosure statement (PDS) before making a decision to acquire a financial product. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Financial Services Guide before using this website. The Rask Group Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (#1280930) of AFSL #383169.

At the time of publishing, the author does not have a financial or commercial interest in any of the companies mentioned.
Skip to content